United States v. Scott Carnell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that evidence of relevant conduct must be reliable, and the government bears the bur- den of proving it by a preponderance of the evidence
• finding that meth being referred to as “crystalline” fails to meet the burden at sentencing without “evidence from a chemist or other relevant expert that methamphetamine cannot form a crystalline structure below 80% purity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Scott Carnell

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Scott Carnell
  Seventh Circuit· 2022-06-02· cited 2×
• United States v. Scott Carnell
  Seventh Circuit· 2020-08-28