United States v. Scott Brian Janoe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that the district court may be required to hold a hearing where there is evidence of disagreement between the defendant and counsel
• holding an indictment for robbery was sufficient where the indictment incorrectly named the FDIC as the federal insurer instead of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation
• holding the defendant’s right to testify was not denied where “defendant made no objection to his attorney’s statements that defendant would not testify and made no request to testify”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).