United States Court of Military Appeals· 6/26/1978
United States v. Scoby
Citations
- 5 M.J. 160
- 1978 CMA LEXIS 11051
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Constitution does not protect acts of oral sex between unmarried adults, but declining to address whether an exception would exist for a married couple
- upholding Article 125 as applied to acts committed in a public place
- sexual act in a “semi-private” living area in the immediate vicinity of four to seven others who may or may not have been asleep
- “Where there is ‘a substantial range of conduct’ to which” a statute applies, the statute “is not fatally deficient, even though an area of uncertainty may remain.”
- where the Court of Military Appeals utilized a similar method of legal analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cook, Fletcher, Perry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. MarcumCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2004-08-23· cited 113×
- United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1979-11-13· cited 71×
- Joseph G. Hatheway, Jr. v. Secretary of the ArmyNinth Circuit· 1981-04-20· cited 63×
- United States v. McGuinnessUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1992-09-14· cited 49×
- United States v. IzquierdoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1999-09-10· cited 32×
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1990-04-12· cited 30×
- United States v. HendersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1992-03-24· cited 25×
- United States v. McFarlinU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1985-01-08· cited 20×
- United States v. HendersonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review· 1991-04-24· cited 17×
- United States v. CarrU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review· 1989-03-23· cited 16×
- United States v. BygraveCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1997-08-28· cited 13×
- United States v. HoardU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1981-10-13· cited 11×
- United States v. FergusonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review· 1994-05-05· cited 11×
- United States v. PritchardCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1996-09-24· cited 9×
- United States v. JonesU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1982-11-30· cited 8×
- United States v. LinnearUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1983-06-30· cited 6×
- United States v. NegronU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1989-04-28· cited 6×
- United States v. DyerU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1986-05-06· cited 5×
- United States v. BlakeU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1991-11-26· cited 5×
- United States v. GatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1994-09-16· cited 5×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 3,272×
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 3,038×
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1928-06-04· cited 2,291×
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 1,862×
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court· 1972-03-22· cited 1,851×
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court· 1974-06-19· cited 1,846×
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court· 1975-06-24· cited 1,202×
- Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-04-26· cited 647×
- O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 626×
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 550×
- Rose v. LockeSupreme Court· 1975-11-17· cited 516×
- Jimenez v. WeinbergerSupreme Court· 1974-06-19· cited 343×
- Wainwright v. StoneSupreme Court· 1973-11-05· cited 316×
- Doe v. Commonwealth's Attorney for RichmondSupreme Court· 1976-03-29· cited 175×
- Doe v. Commonwealth's Atty. for City of RichmondE.D. Virginia· 1975-10-24· cited 151×
- Fribourg Navigation Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court· 1966-03-07· cited 134×
- United States v. John Paul MalinowskiThird Circuit· 1973-05-07· cited 134×
- United States v. HedlundUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1976-09-17· cited 106×
- New York State Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc. v. RockefellerE.D. New York· 1973-04-10· cited 104×
- United States v. BerryUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1956-01-27· cited 93×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.