· 3/26/1998
United States v. Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn (In Re Unitcast, Inc.)
Citations
- 219 B.R. 741
- 1998 FED App. 0007P
- 39 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1022
- 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 323
- 81 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1240
- 32 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 439
- 1998 WL 135463
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that such claims should be treated as an administrative expense claim pursuant to § 503 and are not entitled to super-priority treatment
- nothing in § 726(b) compels disgorgement of fees paid to chapter 11 professionals in order to pay an IRS administrative expense claim
- “Section 503(b)(1)(B) provides for administrative expense priority for taxes which are incurred by the estate.”
- “ ‘[T]he proper standard for determining [a] claim’s administrative priority looks to when the acts giving rise to [the] liability took place, not when they accrued’ ”
- “disgorgement is a remedy within the discretion of bankruptcy judges as the final arbiters of professional fee requests under [sections] 330 and 331 of the Code”
- parties’ expectation of finality of the payment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lundin, Stosberg, Waldron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.