Skip to main content
· 3/26/1998

United States v. Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn (In Re Unitcast, Inc.)

Citations

  • 219 B.R. 741
  • 1998 FED App. 0007P
  • 39 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1022
  • 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 323
  • 81 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1240
  • 32 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 439
  • 1998 WL 135463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that such claims should be treated as an administrative expense claim pursuant to § 503 and are not entitled to super-priority treatment
  • nothing in § 726(b) compels disgorgement of fees paid to chapter 11 professionals in order to pay an IRS administrative expense claim
  • “Section 503(b)(1)(B) provides for administrative expense priority for taxes which are incurred by the estate.”
  • “ ‘[T]he proper standard for determining [a] claim’s administrative priority looks to when the acts giving rise to [the] liability took place, not when they accrued’ ”
  • “disgorgement is a remedy within the discretion of bankruptcy judges as the final arbiters of professional fee requests under [sections] 330 and 331 of the Code”
  • parties’ expectation of finality of the payment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lundin, Stosberg, Waldron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.