United States v. Schenley Distillers Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that where defendant challenges sufficiency of evidence as to some elements “but does not challenge the State’s evidence of the other elements of the crime,” this Court examines only the sufficiency of the evidence concerning the challenged elements
• invoking Rule 2 in order to address the question raised by the defendant on appeal which defendant failed to preserve for appellate review where the defendant's counsel failed to obtain a ruling on the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).