United States v. Schaier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The defendant may be convicted even though he did not know that his statement was material.”
• where the court said an indictment was valid if it set out the specific purpose of the grand jury inquiry and stated that defendant’s testimony was material thereto. The specific United States Code sections involved were pleaded in the indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Deets
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1972-02-25· cited 41×
• United States v. Cobert
  S.D. California· 1964-03-20· cited 19×
• Ho Yim v. William Barr
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-08-25· cited 9×
• Wheeler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-04-25· cited 2×
• United States v. Naddeo
  N.D. Ohio· 1972-01-18· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. John Alu
  Second Circuit· 1957-06-07· cited 66×
• United States v. McGovern
  Second Circuit· 1932-08-23· cited 40×
• Travis v. United States
  Tenth Circuit· 1941-11-03· cited 35×
• United States v. Laut
  S.D. New York· 1955-01-25· cited 15×
• Williams v. Mulcahey
  Supreme Court· 1958-04-28· cited 13×
• United States v. Allen
  E.D. Michigan· 1955-05-11· cited 9×
• Elmer James Bilderback, Jr. v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1957-12-17· cited 6×
• United States v. Kennefick
  N.D. Illinois· 1956-09-26· cited 2×