Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 5/17/2011
United States v. Savala
Citations
- 70 M.J. 70
- 2011 CAAF LEXIS 415
- 2011 WL 1886285
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that cross-examination may inquire into otherwise inadmissible evidence if the prosecution opens the door on direct exami- nation
- finding prejudice where “the ruling by the military judge enabled the prosecution to enhance the credibility of its version while handcuffing the defense”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Effron, Erdmann, Ryan, Stucky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. AkbarCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2015-08-19· cited 174×
- United States v. TearmanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2013-03-19· cited 40×
- United States v. JasperCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2013-06-04· cited 39×
- United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2016-06-17· cited 26×
- United States v. ChisumAir Force Court of Criminal Appeals· 2016-11-29· cited 14×
- United States v. WilderCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2016-03-07· cited 9×
- United States v. TrotterNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2016-11-17
- United States v. LancinaNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2017-06-30
- United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2018-03-26
- United States v. KohlbekCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2019-02-25
- United States v. SteenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2021-06-14
- United States v. DILLENBURGERNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2025-03-27
- United States v. CLARKNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2025-12-30
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2026-04-13
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 3,777×
- Schiro v. FarleySupreme Court· 1994-01-19· cited 550×
- United States v. TooheyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2006-08-09· cited 536×
- United States v. McElhaneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2000-09-14· cited 249×
- United States v. WeeksUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1985-05-13· cited 119×
- United States v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2007-06-22· cited 111×
- United States v. MoultonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1997-09-29· cited 110×
- United States v. DossCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2002-08-23· cited 86×
- United States v. BankerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2004-08-23· cited 74×
- United States v. MossCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2006-06-21· cited 49×
- United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2002-05-02· cited 44×
- United States v. WelchUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1987-09-21· cited 40×
- United States v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2006-03-14· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.