United States v. Saul Lopez-Armenta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is well-settled that an unconditional guilty plea con- stitutes a waiver of the right to appeal all nonjurisdictional antecedent rul- ings and cures all antecedent constitutional defects.” (emphasis added
• “[I]t is well-settled that an unconditional guilty plea constitutes a waiver of the right to appeal all nonjurisdietional antecedent rulings and cures all antecedent constitutional defects.”
• “[I]t is well-settled that an unconditional guilty plea constitutes a waiver of the right to appeal all nonjurisdictional antecedent rulings and cures all antecedent constitutional defects.”
• “[I]t is well-settled that an unconditional guilty plea constitutes a waiver of the right to appeal all nonjurisdictional antecedent rulings and cures all antecedent constitutional defects.”
• '[I]t is well-settled that an 3 unconditional guilty plea constitutes a waiver of the right to appeal all nonjurisdictional antecedent rulings and cures all antecedent constitutional defects.'
• \[I]t is well-settled that an unconditional guilty plea constitutes a waiver of the right 15 to appeal all nonjurisdictional antecedent rulings and cures all antecedent constitutional defects.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).