· 6/16/1992
United States v. Sanford R. Morrison
Citations
- 967 F.2d 264
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 13712
- 1992 WL 130554
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding prejudice where the defendant “had waited until the eve of trial before pleading guilty” and the process of preparing the key witnesses was “trauma[tic]”
- affirming the district court’s decision to deny a motion to withdraw a guilty plea when the “purported new evidence was . . . only weak impeachment evidence”
- “An assertion of innocence — even a ‘swift change of heart after the plea’ — does not constitute a ‘fair and just reason’ to grant withdrawal.”
- “The plea of guilty is a solemn act not to be disregarded because of belated misgivings about [its] wisdom.”
- “Whether we classify this as prejudice to the government, or prejudice to the complaining victim, it is real prejudice, caused by the timing of [the defendant’s] guilty plea and subsequent attempts to withdraw.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beam, Heaney, Loken
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.