Skip to main content
· 6/16/1992

United States v. Sanford R. Morrison

Citations

  • 967 F.2d 264
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 13712
  • 1992 WL 130554

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding prejudice where the defendant “had waited until the eve of trial before pleading guilty” and the process of preparing the key witnesses was “trauma[tic]”
  • affirming the district court’s decision to deny a motion to withdraw a guilty plea when the “purported new evidence was . . . only weak impeachment evidence”
  • “An assertion of innocence — even a ‘swift change of heart after the plea’ — does not constitute a ‘fair and just reason’ to grant withdrawal.”
  • “The plea of guilty is a solemn act not to be disregarded because of belated misgivings about [its] wisdom.”
  • “Whether we classify this as prejudice to the government, or prejudice to the complaining victim, it is real prejudice, caused by the timing of [the defendant’s] guilty plea and subsequent attempts to withdraw.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beam, Heaney, Loken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.