United States v. Sandborn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing a medical presentation authored by a company executive, but concluding that the presentation was “not sufficient to place defendant on notice of the possible risks of its product”
• “[A]s the Second Circuit has explained, it is the proper role of the district court to consider the admissibility of expert testimony in determining whether summary judgment is warranted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).