United States v. Samuel W. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding probable cause to arrest the defendant where an informant identified him as a drug dealer and police observed a 6 “pattern of travel to and from” the same location and associations with “individuals . . . involved in the sale of narcotics”
• staleness did not negate probable cause in drug trafficking conspiracy that had been going on for several years
• staleness judged on case-by-case basis depending on the nature of the criminal activity and consideration of facts in the affidavit indicating protracted and continuous nature
• staleness did not negate probable cause in drug trafficking conspiracy that had been going on for several years
• “[protracted and continuous activity is inherent in a large-scale narcotics operation”
• “Protracted and continuous activity is inherent in a large-scale narcotics operation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).