· 9/30/2005
United States v. Samuel Saldana, Jr., United States of America v. Saul Saldana
Citations
- 427 F.3d 298
- 26 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 707
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 21304
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding sentence four times the Guidelines maximum despite “misgivings about the length of th[e] sentence”
- “After it considers the factors listed under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), a district court has discretion under 18 U.S.C. § 3584 to depart upwardly by running sentences consecutively, even when U.S.S.G. § 5G1.2 would otherwise mandate that the sentences run concurrently.”
- 50-month departure above the four- to ten-month guidelines range
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clement, Jones, Wiener
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.