Skip to main content
· 2/24/2003

United States v. Samuel Pauley John Horvath, Alice Pauley Joseph Morrison

Citations

  • 321 F.3d 578
  • 33 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20158
  • 54 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1252
  • 55 ERC (BNA) 2094
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3295
  • 2003 WL 397545

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that courts may not grant Rule 60(b) relief “except upon a motion from the affected party”
  • reasoning that “because Rule 60(b) explicitly requires relief under the rule to occur ‘on motion,’ courts may not grant such relief except upon ‘a motion from the affected party’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Guy, Moore, Beckwith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.