United States v. Samuel Orozco-Acosta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the CNR, certifying no record of consent for re-admission into the United States, was testimonial but the violation of the defendant's confrontation right caused by its admission was harmless error
• holding that the CNR, certifying no record of consent for re-admission into the United States, was testimonial but the violation of the defendant's confrontation right caused by its admission was harmless error
• overruling Cervantes-Flores and holding admission of a certificate regarding the nonexistence of immigration records violated the defendant’s Sixth Amendment confrontation right
• warning to alien ordered deported is non-testimonial
• describing a warrant of removal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).