United States v. Samuel Dunkel & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]n light of Williams, the trial court erred because it did not subject the other acts evidence to OEC 403 balancing.”
• under Williams, “(1) evidence offered to show a person’s character and propensity to act accordingly may be relevant under OEC 401; (2) OEC 404(4) supersedes OEC 404(3); (3) OEC 404(4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).