United States v. Samuel Duncan, Jr., Grace Duncan, Gay Nell Duncan, Marshall Sutton, Angela F. Turner, Arthur D. Wilson, and Oscar L. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that medical records from hospital were the business records of the insurance company and explicitly recognizing that “there is no requirement that the [business] records be created by the business having custody of them”
• finding that insurance companies’ records compiled from hospital records qualified as business records of the insurance companies
• finding that insurance companies’ records compiled from hospital records qualified as business records of the insurance companies
• affirming a mail fraud conviction where the defendant participated in staged car accidents in order to obtain benefits under hospitalization insurance policies
• holding in prosecution for mail fraud that testimony of forged 49 No. 09-10560 signature on disability statement, which tended to rebut the claim that defendants had innocently filed insurance claims for genuine medical reasons, was not unduly prejudicial
• holding in prosecution for mail fraud that testimony of forged 49 No. 09-10560 signature on disability statement, which tended to rebut the claim that defendants had innocently filed insurance claims for genuine medical reasons, was not unduly prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).