Skip to main content
· 3/13/2006

United States v. Samuel Constanza Alvarado

Citations

  • 440 F.3d 191
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 6055
  • 2006 WL 598152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the filing of a federal criminal complaint “does not give rise to any Sixth Amendment right” because it “does not commence a formal prosecution”
  • stating that, for Sixth Amendment purposes, “[t]he filing of a federal criminal complaint does not commence a formal prosecution”
  • stating that, for Sixth Amendment purpos- es, “[t]he filing of a federal criminal complaint does not commence a formal prosecution”
  • “By its own terms, the Sixth Amendment applies to ‘criminal prosecutions ’ as opposed to criminal investigations.”
  • “The filing of a federal criminal complaint does not commence a formal prosecution.”
  • “The filing of a federal criminal complaint does not commence a formal prosecution. Rather, the main reason a law enforcement officer files such a complaint is to establish probable cause for an arrest warrant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, Niemeyer, King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.