Skip to main content
· 2/28/1984

United States v. Samuel Charles Gillyard

Citations

  • 726 F.2d 1426
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25065

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying also on lack of clear indication in defendant’s Miranda warnings that he would be subjected to post-polygraph interrogation
  • investigation and arrest of postal employee for embezzlement from the mail

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Skopil, Ferguson, Can-By

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.