United States v. Samir S. Najjar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing de novo as a question of law the district court’s denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction due to the expiration of the statute of limitations
• “[T]he expiration of the statute of limitations does not divest a district court of subject matter jurisdiction, but rather constitutes an affirmative defense, which the defendant can waive . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).