United States v. Sam T. Iaquinta, Velma E. Shine, United States of America v. Sam Thomas Iaquinta, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the actions of federal officers present and assist- ing with arrest and obtaining search warrants were insufficient to trigger the Speedy Trial Act’s time limit
• noting that rule applies even where federal involvement in joint investigation was \extensive\ or \substantial\
• noting that rule applies even where federal involvement in joint investigation was “extensive” or “substantial”
• suggesting inappropriateness of probe into federal prosecutor’s motives because prosecutor not required to file federal charges as soon as he has enough evidence to prosecute
• sug- gesting inappropriateness of probe into federal prosecutor's motives because prosecutor not required to file federal charges as soon as he has enough evidence to prosecute
• sug- gesting inappropriateness of probe into federal prosecutor's motives because prosecutor not required to file federal charges as soon as he has enough evidence to prosecute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).