United States v. Sam J. Schor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court erred in failing to afford defense counsel opportunity to be heard before responding to jury note
• allowing amendment where defendant corporation removed on the 11 basis of diversity jurisdiction and merely stated that it was a citizen of New York, 12 rather than disclosing its state of incorporation and principal place of business

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).