Skip to main content
· 1/12/1998

United States v. Salzano

Citations

  • 994 F. Supp. 1321
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1497
  • 1998 WL 55025

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[i]n determining whether [a subpoena is] due to be quashed, this Court must balance [the] need for discovery against the burden imposed upon [the party resisting discovery], along with their interest in keeping the requested information confidential”
  • party seeking to enforce a subpoena has the burden of demonstrating relevancy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saffels

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.