United States v. Salvador Castro-Juarez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \review of a sentence for reasonableness is not affected by whether the defendant had the foresight to label his sentence `unreasonable' before the sentencing hearing adjourned\
• holding that “re- view of a sentence for reasonableness is not affected by whether the defendant had the foresight to label his sentence ‘unreasonable’ before the sentencing hearing adjourned”
• looking at departure analysis “only by way of analogy” to aid the court’s determination of the sentence’s reasonableness
• rejecting government’s urging that defendant’s sentence be reviewed for plain error
• “Since the district court will already have heard argument and allocution from the parties and weighed the relevant § 3553(a
• “[O]ur review of a sentence for reasonableness is not affected by whether the defendant had the foresight to label his sentence ‘unreasonable’ before the sentencing hearing adjourned.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).