United States v. Salli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that improper testimony did not require mistrial where it “added very little to what was already in evidence”
• concluding that improper testimony did not require mistrial where it “added very little to what was already in evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).