United States v. Salazar-Montero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the ‘knowledge’ requirement in § 1028A(a)(l) does require proof that the defendant knew that the means of identification that he used belonged to another person”
• “This court has, on numerous occasions, pointed out that the first approach to statutory interpretation is (an evaluation of] the ‘plain language of the statute in question.”’) (citations omitted); United States v. Dawson, 64 F.4th 1227, 1236 (11th Cir 2023

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).