United States v. Salam Daniel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[S]uch factors as intervening time, removal of the prisoner to a different place, and change in the identity of interrogators could make a second, warned statement voluntary, despite the prior involuntary statement.”
• where defendant’s second, admissible statement “supplied greater information” than the first, inadmissible one, the first confession was “cumulative and unnecessary to establishing the case against the defendant” so that its admission “was harmless error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).