United States v. Salado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for an evidentiary hearing on actual conflict and adverse effect in the joint-representation context due, in part, to the “sparsity of the record”
• remanding the case for an “after-the-fact” hearing under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 44(c) to determine whether there was an actual conflict of interest
• remanding to the district court on direct appeal for a determination of whether an actual conflict of interest existed and, if so, whether the conflict adversely affected the attorney’s performance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).