United States v. Sakhawat Ullah, Jr., United States of America v. Mary Katherine Gosho-Kim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that manifest injustice would result if the court failed to address the issue of the nonunanimous jury verdict
• recognizing that this court “may review an issue if the failure to raise the issue properly did not prejudice the defense of the opposing party”
• stating that we may consider an issue not raised in the opening brief “if a failure to do so would result in manifest injustice”
• stating that we may consider an issue not raised in the opening brief “if a failure to do so would result in manifest injustice”
• explaining that we will consider issues raised for the first time in a reply brief for “ ‘good cause shown’ ” (quoting Fed. R. App. P. 2)
• stating that the court “will not ordinarily consider matters on appeal that are not specifically and distinctly argued in appellant's opening brief’’ (quoting Miller v. Fairchild Indus., Inc., 797 F.2d 727, 738 (9th Cir.1986)) (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).