United States v. Saingerard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining when a factfinder chooses between two permissible views of the evidence, its findings are not clearly erroneous
• “Where there are two permissible views of the evidence, the factfinder’s choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous.”
• “Where there are two permissible views of the evidence, the factfinder’s choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous.”
• “Where there are two permissible views of the evidence, the factfinder’s choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).