E.D. New York· 11/28/1998
United States v. Sainato
Citations
- 29 F. Supp. 2d 116
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19150
- 1998 WL 852861
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding notes that were “rough, choppy, disjointed, scattered jottings full of sentence fragments” did not fall within Rule 26.2
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spatt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.