Skip to main content
· 9/25/1989

United States v. Sai Keung Wong, United States of America v. Sui Keung Chan, United States of America v. Pak Chuen Ip

Citations

  • 886 F.2d 252
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14331

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[t]he defense was allowed to point out [the witness’] perjury to the jury”
  • upholding a denial of Cl disclosure since, assuming that the defendants had made the necessary threshold showing to reach this stage, review of the evidence produced in camera gave “no indication that the informant could have provided any testimony that would have helped the defense”
  • “mere suspicion that information will prove helpful is insufficient to require disclosure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Farris, Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.