· 9/25/1989
United States v. Sai Keung Wong, United States of America v. Sui Keung Chan, United States of America v. Pak Chuen Ip
Citations
- 886 F.2d 252
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14331
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[t]he defense was allowed to point out [the witness’] perjury to the jury”
- upholding a denial of Cl disclosure since, assuming that the defendants had made the necessary threshold showing to reach this stage, review of the evidence produced in camera gave “no indication that the informant could have provided any testimony that would have helped the defense”
- “mere suspicion that information will prove helpful is insufficient to require disclosure”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wright, Farris, Nelson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.