United States v. Saffo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the “know or have reasonable cause to believe” No. 19-3236 United States v. Smith Page 9 standard sufficed for “guilty mind” or “guilty knowledge” requirement for imposing criminal liability, and was “akin to actual knowledge”
• rejecting challenge to “reasonable cause to believe” standard because the defendant could only have understood it to proscribe the sale of illegal pseudoephedrine
• “The ‘reasonable cause to believe’ standard thus comports with the sub- jective ‘guilty mind’ or ‘guilty knowledge’ requirement for imposing criminal liability.”
• “We review de novo questions regarding a statute’s constitutionality.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).