· 3/15/1999
United States v. Sacko
Citations
- 178 F.3d 1
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18749
- 1999 WL 413876
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining age of victim from the indictment, and explaining the relevance of that modified age for the categorical test
- allowing sentencing court to look to charging document “to discern which type of crime” underlies conviction
- affirming the sentencing court’s judicial notice of the defendant’s age since his date of birth was written in the state court indict- ment
- limiting district court’s resort to presentence report to that of determining the character of the conviction and forbidding an examination of the underlying facts to ascertain whether violence was used
- limiting district court's resort to presentence report to that of determining the character of the conviction and forbidding an examination of the underlying facts to ascertain whether violence was used
- district court abused its discretion in awarding costs where 7 the plaintiff “had not obtained employment at the time of the filing of the cost bill” and the 8 prevailing party sought $46,710.97
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Coffin, Boudin, Selya, Stahl, Lynch, Lipez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.