United States v. Sabatka

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant claimed plaintiff's statistics were inaccurate but failed to show that the figures used by plaintiff produced inaccurate results or that a different result would have been reached using different analytical basis
• \To deny reinstatement to a victim of discrimination merely because of the hostility engendered by the prosecution of a discrimination suit would frustrate the make-whole purpose of Title VIL\
• defendant claimed plaintiff’s statistics were inaccurate but failed to show that the figures used by plaintiff produced inaccurate results or that a different result would have been reached using different analytical basis
• “To deny reinstatement to a victim of discrimination merely because of the hostility engendered by the prosecution of a discrimination suit would frustrate the make-whole purpose of Title VII.”
• trial court properly “took into consideration the subjective decisionmaking of the Company”
• reviewing a district court order denying reinstatement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).