Skip to main content
· 1/6/2011

United States v. Saadiq Shabazz

Citations

  • 633 F.3d 342
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 251
  • 2011 WL 31794

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that § 3583(e)(3) “limits only the amount of revocation imprisonment the revoking court may impose each time it revokes a defendant’s supervised release”
  • “If Congress had intended for courts to continue reading the language at the end of § 3583(e)(3) as an aggregate limit on revocation imprisonment it would have left this portion of § 3583(e)(3) unaltered.”
  • “If Congress had intended for courts to continue reading the language at the end of § 3583(e)(3) as an aggregate limit on revocation imprisonment it would have left ... § 3583(e)(3) unaltered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Stewart, Owen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.