Skip to main content
· 6/20/2012

United States v. Ryan Mudd

Citations

  • 685 F.3d 473
  • 2012 WL 2335305
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 12578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that there was sufficient evidence of constructive possession where, in part, the defendant identified that the firearm in question had been in a black bag
  • finding conflict where oral pronouncement merely “recommended ... treatment instead of testing” while written judgment required defendant to submit to testing
  • finding conflict where oral pronouncement merely “recommended . . . treatment instead of testing” while written judgment required defendant to submit to testing
  • finding a conflict where the oral pronouncement allowed substance-abuse treatment in lieu of testing but the written judgment required testing
  • holding constructive possession may be established by circumstantial evidence
  • “Inconsistent statements and implausible explanations are among the behaviors previously recognized in this circuit as circumstantial evidence of guilty knowledge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Elrod, Southwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.