Skip to main content
· 9/3/1999

United States v. Rutilio Garcia-Sanchez, A.K.A. Jose

Citations

  • 189 F.3d 1143
  • 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7306
  • 99 Daily Journal DAR 9351
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 20992
  • 1999 WL 683894

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating a sentence and remanding, holding that “the district court had . . . an independent obligation to ensure that the sentence was supported by sufficient, reliable evidence”
  • “[A] defendant [has a] due process right to ensure the reliability of information used at sentencing.”
  • “[A] defendant [has a] due process right to ensure the reliability of information used at sentencing.”
  • “Under the Guidelines each conspirator . . . is to be judged not on the distribution made by the entire conspiracy but on the basis of the quantity of drugs which he reasonably foresaw or which fell within ‘the scope’ of his particular agreement with the conspira- tors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Reavley, McKeown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.