United States v. Ruth Whited

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a defendant's direct challenge to the constitutionality of the statute of conviction was not barred by her guilty plea
• noting that Morrison “echoed both the holding of Lopez and its underlying reasoning”
• explaining the elements of Theft from a Health Care Benefit Program
• “We consider an indictment sufficient if, when considered in its entirety, it adequately informs the defendant of the charges against her that she may prepare a defense and invoke the double jeopardy clause when appropriate.”
• “We consider an indictment sufficient if, when considered in its entirety, it adequately informs the defendant of the charges against her such that she may prepare a defense and invoke the double jeopardy clause where appropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).