Skip to main content
· 12/18/2006

United States v. Ruth Kane

Citations

  • 470 F.3d 1277
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31060
  • 2006 WL 3716587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding district court did not abuse its discretion in considering intra-conspiracy disparity
  • holding district court did not abuse its discretion in considering intraconspiracy disparity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Hansen, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.