United States Court of Military Appeals· 6/22/1953

United States v. Rushlow

Citations

2 C.M.A. 641
2 USCMA 641
10 C.M.R. 139
1953 CMA LEXIS 807
1953 WL 1792

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

re- fusing to enforce the President’s guidance that a contingent purpose to return qualifies as an intent to remain away permanently for the purpose of Article 85, UCMJ
re- fusing to enforce the President’s guidance that a contingent purpose to return qualifies as an intent to remain away permanently for the purpose of Article 85, UCMJ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bros, Latimer, Man, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Rushlow

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.