United States v. Rumsey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming Appellate Division’s holding that the small claims court does not have an obligation to obtain evidence and make a party’s case for him
• “It is well established that, on appeal, [this] Court must defer to the credibility decision made by the factfinder, whether it be the judge’or the jury.”
• “It is well established that, on appeal, the court must defer to the credibility decision made by the factfinder, whether it be the judge or the jury.”
• “It is well established that, on appeal, [this] Court must defer to the credibility decision made by the factfinder, whether it be the judge or the jury.”
• “When reviewing decisions of the Appellate Division of the Superior Court, we typically consider the underlying rulings made by the Magistrate Division only to the extent that they were adopted or affirmed by the judge of the Appellate Division.” (emphasis added) (citation omitted)
• small claims action to recover stolen money

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).