United States v. Ruggles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[cjlaims-processing rules may be non-waivable when the rule implicates judicial interests beyond those of the parties.” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that subsequent events may ripen otherwise premature court proceedings
• holding that subsequent events may ripen otherwise premature court proceedings
• noting that affirmative defenses are waived if not raised at the first opportunity in the Superior Court
• explaining that “[wjhen statutes from other jurisdictions are substantially similar to a Virgin Islands statute, this Court may look for guidance at how that jurisdiction’s courts have interpreted the similar statute” (citation omitted)
• stating when statutes from other jurisdictions are substantiaiiy similar to a Virgin Islands statute this Court may look for guidance at how thatjurisdiction s courts have interpreted the similar statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).