United States v. Rufus Robinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing a sentence of one night for possession of child pornography because of the district court’s “failure to take into account the seriousness of Defendant’s particular crime [and] the lack of serious consideration for the need for deterrence.”
• “A court should not require evidence of likely publicity before taking into account the Congressional sentencing goal of deterrence ***.”
• “A court should not require evidence of likely publicity before taking into account the Congressional sentencing goal of deterrence ***.”
• “Defendant’s contentions regarding mental illness, if credible, could qualify as a compelling justification that may support a significant downward variance from the Guidelines range.”
• “A court should not require evidence of likely publicity before taking into account the Congressional sentencing goal of deterrence ***.”
• \A court should not require evidence of likely publicity before taking into account the Congressional sentencing goal of deterrence * * *.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).