Skip to main content
· 9/14/1994

United States v. Rufino Garcia, Miguel Vaca and Federico Rivera

Citations

  • 35 F.3d 1125
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the challenge to the denial of the acceptance reduction was “groundless” where the defendant was “less than truthful in describing his role in the offense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Hill, Coffey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.