· 10/28/1996
United States v. Ruff (In Re Rush-Hampton Industries, Inc.)
Citations
- 98 F.3d 614
- 201 B.R. 614
- 37 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1
- 78 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6987
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27794
- 1996 WL 585392
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the otherwise harmless violation of the automatic stay [did not] suffice to deprive the IRS of the post-petition interest setoff to which ... it would have been entitled had it first sought a lifting of the stay from the bankruptcy court”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tjoflat, Roney, Campbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.