Ninth Circuit· 9/30/2009
United States v. Ruehle
Citations
- 583 F.3d 600
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 21450
- 2009 WL 3152971
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the party asserting an attorney-client privilege has the burden of proving “each essential element” of that privilege
- noting that busi- ness advice does not fall within the purview of attorney-client privilege even if the advisor is a lawyer
- noting that business advice does not fall within the purview of attorney–client privilege even if the advisor is a lawyer
- noting that busi- ness advice does not fall within the purview of attorney-client privilege even if the advisor is a lawyer
- noting that the privilege “‘ought 4 to be strictly confined within the narrowest possible limits consistent with the logic of its 5 principle’”
- finding that by applying California law regarding attorney client privilege, “[t]he district court applied a liberal view of the privilege that conflicts with the strict view applied under 27 federal common law”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fisher, Gould, Tallman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. GrafNinth Circuit· 2010-07-07· cited 249×
- United States v. RicheyNinth Circuit· 2011-01-21· cited 201×
- Perry v. SchwarzeneggerNinth Circuit· 2010-01-04· cited 119×
- Pacific Pictures Corp. v. United States District CourtNinth Circuit· 2012-05-10· cited 92×
- Louis Branch v. D. UmphenourNinth Circuit· 2019-09-05· cited 86×
- Koumoulis v. Independent Financial Marketing Group, Inc.E.D. New York· 2013-11-01· cited 54×
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.N.D. California· 2015-04-03· cited 28×
- Perry v. SchwarzeneggerNinth Circuit· 2009-12-11· cited 22×
- Youngs v. PeaceHealthWashington Supreme Court· 2014-01-23· cited 13×
- Frankie Greer v. County of San DiegoNinth Circuit· 2025-02-10· cited 10×
- A.F. v. Providence Health PlanD. Oregon· 2016-03-24· cited 9×
- In Re Hotels Nevada, LLCD. Nevada· 2011-09-14· cited 8×
- Schaeffer v. Gregory Village Partners, L.P.N.D. California· 2015-01-26· cited 8×
- Skyline Wesleyan Church v. California Department of Managed Health CareS.D. California· 2017-09-22· cited 7×
- United States v. NorrisE.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-07-12· cited 5×
- Riverkeeper v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersD. Oregon· 2014-08-14· cited 4×
- Arizona ex rel. Goddard v. Frito-Lay, Inc.D. Arizona· 2011-03-07· cited 3×
- New York City Employees' Retirement System v. JobsNinth Circuit· 2010-01-28· cited 2×
- American Civil Liberties Union v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationN.D. California· 2015-11-17· cited 2×
- Jones v. HernandezS.D. California· 2017-08-16· cited 2×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-01-13· cited 3,227×
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2009-01-14· cited 1,549×
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon HorowitzSecond Circuit· 1973-10-09· cited 303×
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. United States of America v. The Corporation 1Ninth Circuit· 1992-08-31· cited 224×
- United States v. CraigheadNinth Circuit· 2008-08-21· cited 190×
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Curtis R. Martin, Jr., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 2002-03-13· cited 183×
- United States v. Raymond M. GrayNinth Circuit· 1989-06-05· cited 181×
- Robert L. Clarke, Comptroller of the Currency v. American Commerce National Bank, Anaheim, CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1992-09-08· cited 146×
- United States v. NelsonNinth Circuit· 1998-02-26· cited 143×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tei Fu CHEN; The Sunrider Corporation, Defendants-AppellantsNinth Circuit· 1996-11-04· cited 140×
- United States v. David Phillip Munoz Bennie E. McGregor Donald L. ThomsonNinth Circuit· 2000-12-06· cited 128×
- In the Matter of Elaine B. Fischel, Contemner-Appellant. United States of America v. Harry MargolisNinth Circuit· 1977-07-13· cited 126×
- United States v. OvertonNinth Circuit· 2009-07-14· cited 110×
- United States v. Richard Plache James AttarianNinth Circuit· 1990-09-07· cited 105×
- United States v. BauerNinth Circuit· 1997-12-22· cited 94×
- In Re Grand Jury SubpoenaFirst Circuit· 2001-11-08· cited 93×
- Herlancer Ross v. City of Memphis, Walter Crews and Alfred Gray, IndividuallySixth Circuit· 2005-09-14· cited 90×
- In Re: Grand Jury Subpoenas, Jane Roe and John Doe. Intervenor v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1998-05-15· cited 79×
- United States v. Gerald L. RogersNinth Circuit· 1985-01-15· cited 75×
- United States v. LoweryEleventh Circuit· 1999-02-03· cited 74×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.