· 9/17/1992
United States v. Rudolph Acosta
Citations
- 972 F.2d 86
- 1992 WL 205934
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding evidence of interstate phone calls between defendant and defendant’s brother in counterfeiting prosecution not unfairly prejudicial
- holding evidence of interstate phone calls between defendant and defendant’s brother in counterfeiting prosecution not unfairly prejudicial
- holding evidence of interstate phone calls between defendant and defendant’s brother in counterfeiting prosecution not unfairly prejudicial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Wiener, Little
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.