United States v. Rudi Bernard Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that \there is no evidence that [the state officer] applied for the warrant at the direction or urging of a federal officer\
• concluding that “there is no evidence that [the state officer] applied for the warrant at the direction or urging of a federal officer”
• observing that mere involvement of federal officers in the execution of the search warrants does not trigger application of Rule 41
• observing that mere involvement of federal officers in the execution of the search warrants does not trigger application of Rule 41
• labeling as \ministerial\ claimed error that government had not returned warrant to magistrate judge within prescribed period
• labeling as “ministerial” appellant’s claimed error that the government had not returned the warrant to the magistrate judge but determining that suppression was not warranted because appellant failed to demonstrate prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).