Skip to main content
· 10/3/2005

United States v. Rudaj

Citations

  • 390 F. Supp. 2d 395
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22092
  • 2005 WL 2420362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • invalidating “protective sweep” where “[t]he agents made no observations that morning that would lead them to believe that somebody else was at the Rudaj residence, nor had they received any prior information to that effect”
  • “The Second Circuit has long recognized that an arresting officer has a duty to ensure that an arrestee is sufficiently dressed before removing her from her residence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cote

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.