Skip to main content
· 9/15/2011

United States v. Rublee

Citations

  • 655 F.3d 835
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 19005
  • 2011 WL 4089532

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a sentencing court may limit a substantial assistance reduction based on factors unrelated to substantial assistance
  • “If the court decides to grant the Rule 35(b) motion, its decision to limit the § 3553(e) reduction, as opposed to extending it further downward, need not be based only on factors related to the assistance provided.”
  • “Because the court had authority to limit the Rule 35(b) reduction ... based on factors unrelated to the substantial assistance [the defendant] provided, his sentence was not imposed ‘in violation of law’ even if based on an unrelated factor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Beam, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.